# |
Notes |
1 |
Product volumes (A: 72%, B: 18%, C: 5%, D: 5%) |
2 |
Complaints (Initial Quality: 24, Reliability: 3, Durability: 2, Other: 1) |
3 |
Region with issues (USA: 18, Europe: 8, Asia: 2, Other: 2) |
4 |
Type of customer (Large Hospital: 11, Medium: 9, Small: 10) |
5 |
Experience with company(High: 15, Low: 14, Other: 1) |
Problem Focus: The primary focus of this analysis is to "Reduce the number of quality issues (defects) with the products." This overarching objective is then narrowed down through the tree diagram.
Dominant Product Category: The "Product Category" split reveals that "Prod A" constitutes 72% of the issues. This makes it the prime target for improvement efforts. The justification given is that "Prod A is the biggest selling item," implying a higher volume of sales could naturally lead to a higher number of reported issues.
Critical Quality Category: The "Quality Category" split points to "Initial Product Quality" as the most significant contributor to defects. This suggests a problem originating early in the product lifecycle, potentially during manufacturing or initial setup. The reason provided, "Most complaints are for initial product quality," reinforces this finding.
Key Geographical Region: The "Region" split highlights "USA" as the area with the most pronounced quality issues. This localization of the problem allows for targeted interventions and resource allocation. The reasoning, "Biggest customer base & span of control is here," suggests that the USA's high sales volume and established operational presence make it a logical focal point for improvement initiatives.
Refined Problem Statement: Based on the above splits, the problem statement is refined to "Reduce the initial product quality issues for Prod A in the USA region." This specific definition allows for focused problem-solving and targeted solutions.
Potential Next Steps: The diagram provides a solid foundation for further investigation. The next logical steps might include: