Labels:
- Add a title for the chart.
- Label the X-axis and Y-axis appropriately.
Appearance:
- Adjust colors, font sizes, or other visual elements as needed.
- Enable/disable gridlines or background shading.
Step 4: Enter the details in worksheet
Click Create, the worksheet will created and then enter all the details. A sample is provided below:
Click on the Analysis Setip and then click Verify tab to ensure all the inputs are okay and shown in a green checkmark.

Step 5: Generate analysis result
Click Analyze and then click Compute Outputs to get the final results
Interpretating Results
- All six failure modes are categorized under "High
Priority (H)" in the risk analysis, indicating significant risks that need
immediate attention.
- The major causes of failure include busy operators, lack of
experience, incorrect priorities, and no emphasis from senior management,
indicating process inefficiencies and a need for better training and leadership
involvement.
- Some failure modes, such as "Collecting the wrong
data" and "Incorrect interpretation of the chart," have no
detection controls (DC = 10). This means there are no safeguards in place to
catch these issues before they cause damage.
- Several failure modes have low prevention control scores (PC
= 5-7), suggesting weak preventive measures. Issues like data collection errors
and incorrect decisions need stronger preventive mechanisms such as automated
data validation and stricter quality control measures.
- Many failures are associated with Statistical Process
Control (SPC) charts, such as not updating charts, incorrect recommendations,
and misinterpretation of charts. This suggests a lack of proper understanding
and adherence to SPC processes.
- Prevention controls like weekly checks and monthly checks
are in place but might not be sufficient, as errors are still occurring.
Strengthening real-time monitoring and validation mechanisms is necessary.
- The failure modes show that lack of experience and training is
a significant contributing factor. Operators need better training, clear
documentation, and standardized procedures to reduce human errors.
- Multiple failure modes highlight a lack of emphasis from
senior management, showing a need for stronger leadership and accountability in
ensuring process adherence.
- Since many issues arise from wrong decisions and
misinterpretations, standardizing data entry, chart updates, and
decision-making guidelines will help mitigate errors.
- Given the recurring issues with manual data collection and
updates, introducing automated SPC chart updates, digital validation, and
AI-driven analytics can significantly reduce errors and improve efficiency.